ArbitrationIntel — Case Study

The law firm marketing case study behind 641 leads in seven months.

The Bennett Legal case study documents how a Texas litigation firm generated 641 solar fraud arbitration leads in seven months, uncovered 1,200 forged electronic signatures via automated IP audit parsing, voided $113,000 predatory promissory notes, achieved a 62% CAC reduction, and replaced an $87,000 fragmented software stack.

In 2025, Tim Ottowitz joined Bennett Legal — a Texas plaintiff firm that takes on solar-panel fraud, commercial trucking, wrongful death, and high-stakes arbitration — as CTO, and rebuilt the marketing operation from the team up. This is what changed, and what it produced.

I. The Firm

A firm that beats corporations for a living.

Bennett Legal fights the cases most firms won't take on — solar-panel fraud, commercial trucking, wrongful death, and high-stakes arbitration against corporations with every incentive to outlast a claimant. In 2025 alone, the firm recovered $35M+ in verdicts, arbitration awards, and settlements. Its tagline says the rest: "We beat corporations. You shouldn't have to fight alone."

By early 2025, the firm's marketing wasn't matching the work in the courtroom. That's what changed next.

II. The Rebuild

Four things changed. Everything else followed.

Tim didn't add a marketing hire on top of what existed. He replaced the operation — team, engine, funnel, and market — one layer at a time.

I

Team

Replaced a conservative, non-AI marketing lead with one trained at an agency with a strong copywriting background, and hired a dedicated video editor for content. The legacy marketing firm — low output, mediocre work — came in-house as a real team.

II

Engine

Onboarded a new SEO firm built around programmatic, entity-graph-based GEO SEO, and rebuilt bennettlegal.com end to end — the platform the content library now runs on.

III

Funnel

Built a full lead pipeline with the team, including a detailed intake workflow from first contact through a signed case — so traffic had somewhere real to go.

IV

New Market

Established the firm in a brand-new case type from scratch, and grew Google Business Profile reviews from 14 to 34 — up 143% — while doing it.

THE FILM · BENNETT LEGAL

Watch how the rebuild actually happened.

A short film on the marketing rebuild at Bennett Legal — the team, the engine, and the numbers behind it.

III. The Results

Seven months. One new case type. Six hundred forty-one leads.

641

Leads in the first seven months of taking the new case type to market.

210

Articles published across 18 pages — the content library doing the ranking.

+143%

Growth in Google Business Profile reviews — 14 to 34.

$35M+

Verdicts, arbitration awards, and settlements recovered by the firm in 2025.

1,200

Forged electronic signatures detected via automated IP & audit certificate parsing.

$113K

Promissory notes voided in AAA arbitration awards and lender stipulations.

-62%

Reduction in blended customer acquisition cost ($180 CPL vs $475 legal call center broker pricing).

$87K

Annual fragmented software stack spend eliminated and consolidated into Obelisk.

Stack Consolidation · Annual Tooling Comparison

$87,000 in legacy software replaced by a single unified operating system.

$44,000 / yr Filevine Enterprise Seats Legacy case management, lead intake modules, and per-user seats replaced by Obelisk claimant ledgers.
$21,000 / yr Moxo Portal & Client Tasks External claimant onboarding and messaging portal eliminated via zero-friction SMS magic links.
$22,000 / yr Data-Extraction Pipelines Third-party OCR API subscriptions and manual paralegal document review superseded by native DocuSign forensics.
Total Legacy Stack: $87,000 per year Obelisk Platform: Unified intake, OCR, statutory eligibility, and AAA dispute generation

The 210-article library isn't a cost center — it's an appreciating asset. Older posts keep ranking and compounding, so cost-per-lead trends down as lead volume trends up. The clearest proof it's a system now, not a person: pages the firm's own CEO wrote by hand are among the best performers in the library. The machine sustains itself.

Recognition: Super Lawyers 2025 & 2026 · National Trial Lawyers Top 100.

IV. Independent Growth Assessment

What Claude found after scraping bennettlegal.com.

Before we told this story, we ran the same automated growth audit we'd run on any firm's site — no prompting toward Bennett Legal, no thumb on the scale. Here is what an outside model found, unprompted.

i

"210 articles across 18 pages, actively publishing through June and July 2026 — a compounding content library, not a brochure site."

ii

"Entity-dense topical authority in solar-panel fraud — GoodLeap, Sunlight Financial, UCC-1 liens, probate, permit fraud. Textbook entity-graph SEO; search engines now read this firm as a solar-fraud authority."

iii

"Question-led, long-tail, dollar-specific headlines — 'Sunlight Financial Cancels $113K Solar Loan.' Engineered for high-intent capture and for AI and featured-snippet answers."

iv

"A full funnel: a fast, modern site, a three-step solar-fraud intake workflow, and 24/7 intake. Traffic converts here — it doesn't just rank."

v

"Verdict: marketing has become a product at this firm. The compounding library means acquisition cost falls as lead volume rises — the rare firm whose growth engine keeps paying forward."

VI. Bring This To Your Firm

This is what we build. Bring it to your firm.

Bennett Legal isn't a special case — it's the model. A rebuilt team, a compounding content engine, a real intake funnel, and a new case type taken from zero. Book fifteen minutes and we'll walk through what the same rebuild looks like for your firm.

Or reach us directly: panel@arbitrationintel.com